United States v. Gordon

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Gordon

146 F. App'x 474

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided October 20, 2005·No. No. 05-11429; D.C. Docket No. 03-00287-CR-A-N·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jay Lewis, appointed counsel for Henry Lee Gordon, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gordon’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jay Lewis, appointed counsel for Henry Lee Gordon, Jr., has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gordon’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gordon, 146 F. App'x 474 (11th Cir. 2005).

Pincite

146 F. App'x 474 (United States v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related