United States v. Gopal Kapoor

Second Circuit

United States v. Gopal Kapoor

79 F.3d 3, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2487, 1996 WL 4133

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedJanuary 2, 1996

Docket94-1538

StatusPublished

This text of 79 F.3d 3 (United States v. Gopal Kapoor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Gopal Kapoor, 79 F.3d 3, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2487, 1996 WL 4133 (2d Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

This appeal is before the Court on remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of United States v. Gaudin, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2310, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995). See Kapoor v. United States, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 43, 133 L.Ed.2d 9 (1995). After inviting the views of the parties as to the appropriate disposition, we are advised that the Government and the appellant have agreed that the case should be remanded to the District Court so that the District Court, by agreement, may vacate the judgment, in which event the appellant will plead guilty to a substituted misdemeanor information.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the case is remanded to the District Court for further action in accordance with the stipulation of the parties.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

This appeal is before the Court on remand from the Supreme Court for further consideration in light of United States v. Gaudin, - U.S. -, 115 S.Ct. 2310, 132 L.Ed.2d 444 (1995). See Kapoor v. United States, - U.S. -, 116 S.Ct. 43, 133 L.Ed.2d 9 (1995). After inviting the views of the parties as to the appropriate disposition, we are advised that the Government and the appellant have agreed that the case should be remanded to the District Court so that the District Court, by agreement, may vacate the judgment, in which event the appellant will plead guilty to a substituted misdemeanor information.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the case is remanded to the District Court for further action in accordance with the stipulation of the parties.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 F.3d 3, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 2487, 1996 WL 4133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gopal-kapoor-ca2-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack