United States v. Goodwin

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Goodwin

479 F. App'x 502

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 2, 2012·No. No. 12-6836·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lamont Goodwin appeals the district court’s text order denying his post-judgment motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Goodwin, No. 5:10-cr-00835-MBS-6 (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bruce Lamont Goodwin appeals the district court’s text order denying his post-judgment motion to reduce his sentence. We have reviewed the record and discern no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Goodwin, No. 5:10-cr-00835-MBS-6 (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Goodwin, 479 F. App'x 502 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

479 F. App'x 502 (United States v. Goodwin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.