United States v. Goodman

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: September 25, 2003
• Docket: 03-6216
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6216

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

MICHAEL ANTONIO GOODMAN,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Elizabeth City. Terrence W. Boyle, Chief District Judge. (CR-92-1-BO)

Submitted: August 27, 2003 Decided: September 25, 2003

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Michael Antonio Goodman, Appellant Pro Se. Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Michael Antonio Goodman appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion fo return of property. Fed. R. Crim. P. 41(e).

We have reviewed the record and found no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm on the district court’s reasoning. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United

States v. Goodman, No. CR-92-1-BO (E.D.N.C. Oct. 25, 2002). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions

are adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED