United States v. Goode

616 F. App'x 90
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 21, 2015
DocketNo. 14-7903
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 616 F. App'x 90 (United States v. Goode) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Goode, 616 F. App'x 90 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Antonio Thomas Goode appeals the district court’s order denying the second post-judgment motion Goode filed in his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2012) proceeding. On appeal, we confine our review to the issues raised in the Appellant’s brief. See 4th Cir. R. 34(b). Because Goode’s informal brief does not challenge the basis for the district court’s disposition, Goode has forfeited appellate review of the court’s order. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s judgment. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and' argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jenkins-Gaylord v. Biden
E.D. North Carolina, 2024
Lyons v. Copperthite
D. Maryland, 2024
Royal v. Gill Bright
D. Maryland, 2022
Carter v. Beulah Braids
D. Maryland, 2021
Poole v. Morrisey
D. Maryland, 2021
Davis v. Walmart Incorporated
W.D. North Carolina, 2021
Foster v. Sullivan
D. Maryland, 2021
Magnas v. Perlman
D. Maryland, 2021
Barreto v. Edu
D. Maryland, 2019

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 F. App'x 90, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-goode-ca4-2015.