United States v. Goodbread

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

United States v. Goodbread

11 M.J. 505, 1981 CMR LEXIS 771

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review·Decided March 31, 1981·No. NCM 80 2669·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error, and the Government’s reply thereto and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused was committed. United States v. Thomas, 10 M.J. 766 (N.C.M.R.1981). Accordingly, the findings of guilty and sentence, as approved on review below, are affirmed.

GREGORY, Senior Judge, and KERCHEVAL, Judge, concur. GLADIS, Judge, dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We have examined the record of trial, the assignments of error, and the Government’s reply thereto and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the accused was committed. United States v. Thomas, 10 M.J. 766 (N.C.M.R.1981). Accordingly, the findings of guilty and sentence, as approved on review below, are affirmed.

GREGORY, Senior Judge, and KERCHEVAL, Judge, concur. GLADIS, Judge, dissents.

United States v. Goodbread, 11 M.J. 505, 1981 CMR LEXIS 771 (usnmcmilrev 1981).

Pincite

11 M.J. 505 (United States v. Goodbread) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinions

Related