United States v. Gonzalez-Rivera
This text of United States v. Gonzalez-Rivera (United States v. Gonzalez-Rivera) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the First Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION--NOT TO BE CITED AS PRECEDENT] United States Court of Appeals For the First Circuit
No. 98-1210
UNITED STATES,
Appellee,
v.
JUAN CARLOS GONZALEZ-RIVERA, A/K/A PACHI,
Defendant, Appellant.
APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF PUERTO RICO
[Hon. Jose Antonio Fuste, U.S. District Judge]
Before
Torruella, Chief Judge, Selya and Boudin, Circuit Judges.
Irma R. Valldejuli on brief for appellant.
August 18, 1998
Per Curiam. Upon careful review of appellant's brief, we conclude that this appeal presents no substantial issue and is appropriate for summary disposition. See 1st Cir. Loc. R. 27.1. Accordingly, we sever this appeal (No. 98-1210) from the other appeals (Nos. 98-1211 and 98-1212) with which it previously was consolidated. Notwithstanding defendant's inference of a retaliatory motive for the district court's choice of a sentence in the middle of the applicable guideline range, this court has no jurisdiction to review a sentence within the applicable range, if that range was correctly determined. United States v. Panet-Collazo, 960 F.2d 256, 261 (1st Cir. 1992). Here, the sentence was within the applicable range, as to which there is no dispute. Therefore, we lack jurisdiction to consider this appeal. Appeal dismissed.
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gonzalez-Rivera, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gonzalez-rivera-ca1-1998.