United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez. Read the opinion of the Court — 477 F.3d 310
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 18, 2007·No. 05-40938·Unpublished

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT April 18, 2007

Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 05-40938 Clerk Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

FERMIN GONZALEZ-RAMIREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 2:04-CR-657-4 --------------------

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BENAVIDES, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

The attorney appointed to represent Fermin Gonzalez-Ramirez

(Gonzalez) has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief

in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967).

Gonzalez has filed a response. Our independent review of

counsel’s brief, Gonzalez’s response, and the record discloses no

nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5TH

CIR. R. 42.2.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez, (5th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez (United States v. Gonzalez-Ramirez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)