United States v. Gonzalez-Huerta

95 F. App'x 249
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 19, 2004·No. No. 03-30198·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Javier Gonzalez-Huerta appeals the 46-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for use of a communications facility to facilitate the illegal possession and distribution of pseudoephedrine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 843(b). We dismiss.

Gonzalez-Huerta contends the district court applied an incorrect legal standard [250] when it denied his request for a downward departure under U.S.S.G. § 5K2.13, based on his reduced mental capacity. The record does not support Gonzalez-Huerta’s contention. The sentencing transcript indicates that the district court expressly referred to the applicable sentencing guideline after considering extensive testimony and argument regarding Gonzalez-Huerta’s mental and emotional state, and concluded that there was not sufficient evidence to support a mental capacity departure. In such cases, we do not review the district court’s discretionary refusal to grant a defendant’s request for departure. See United States v. Davis, 264 F.3d 813, 815 (9th Cir.2001).

DISMISSED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez-Huerta, 95 F. App'x 249 (9th Cir. 2004).

95 F. App'x 249 (United States v. Gonzalez-Huerta) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. James Ernest Davis
264 F.3d 813 (Ninth Circuit, 2001)