United States v. Gonzalez-Gomez

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces

United States v. Gonzalez-Gomez

76 M.J. 174, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 251

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces

DecidedMarch 21, 2017

DocketNo. 17-0200/AR

StatusPublished

This text of 76 M.J. 174 (United States v. Gonzalez-Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Gonzalez-Gomez, 76 M.J. 174, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 251 (Ark. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

CCA 20121100. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER DILATORY POST-TRIAL PROCESSING VIOLATED APPELLANT’S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS AND WARRANTS RELIEF WHEN 782 DAYS ELAPSED BETWEEN DOCKETING AT THE ARMY COURT AND OPINION.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 20121100. On consideration of the petition for grant of review of the decision of the United States Army Court of Criminal Appeals, it is ordered that said petition is hereby granted on the following issue:

WHETHER DILATORY POST-TRIAL PROCESSING VIOLATED APPELLANT’S DUE PROCESS RIGHTS AND WARRANTS RELIEF WHEN 782 DAYS ELAPSED BETWEEN DOCKETING AT THE ARMY COURT AND OPINION.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

76 M.J. 174, 2017 CAAF LEXIS 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gonzalez-gomez-armfor-2017.