United States v. Gonzalez

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 8, 2022·No. 22-10324·Unpublished

Opinion

Case: 22-10324 Document: 00516571607 Page: 1 Date Filed: 12/08/2022

United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

No. 22-10324 FILED December 8, 2022 Summary Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,

Plaintiff—Appellee,

versus

Jose Gonzalez,

Defendant—Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 4:21-CR-303-3

Before Davis, Duncan, and Engelhardt, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Jose Gonzalez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gonzalez has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s

* This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 22-10324 Document: 00516571607 Page: 2 Date Filed: 12/08/2022

No. 22-10324

assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, (5th Cir. 2022).

United States v. Gonzalez (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)
United States v. Flores
632 F.3d 229 (Fifth Circuit, 2011)