United States v. Gonzalez

326 F. App'x 840
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 483 F.3d 390
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 17, 2009·No. 08-20753·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Enrique Roberto Perez Gonzalez presents arguments that he concedes are foreclosed by United States v. Cepeda-Rios, 530 F.3d 333, 335-36 (5th Cir.2008), which held that even after Lopez v. Gonzales, 549 U.S. 47, 127 S.Ct. 625, 166 L.Ed.2d 462 (2006), a second state conviction for simple possession of a controlled substance qualifies as an aggravated felony that supports the imposition of an eight-level enhancement under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(C). The appellant’s unopposed motion for summary disposition is *841 GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, 326 F. App'x 840 (5th Cir. 2009).

326 F. App'x 840 (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez v. Gonzales
549 U.S. 47 (Supreme Court, 2006)
United States v. Cepeda-Rios
530 F.3d 333 (Fifth Circuit, 2008)