United States v. Gonzalez
This text of 85 F. App'x 400 (United States v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Anna Gonzalez appeals the sentence imposed following her guilty-plea conviction for aiding, abetting, and assisting another to possess with intent to distribute six kilograms of cocaine. She contends that the district court erred by not reducing her sentence under the safety-valve provision in U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2.
Gonzalez does not contend that she provided complete and truthful information to the Government. See U.S.S.G. § 5C1.2(a)(5). Therefore, she has not shown that the district court clearly erred by not reducing her sentence under the safety valve. See United States v. Flanagan, 80 F.3d 143, 146-47 (5th Cir.1996); United States v. Wallington, 889 F.2d 573, 580 n. 9 (5th Cir.1989).
AFFIRMED
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
85 F. App'x 400, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gonzalez-ca5-2004.