United States v. Gonzalez

416 F. App'x 264
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzalez. Read the opinion of the Court — 407 F. App'x 705
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 14, 2011·No. 09-4406·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jose Luis Cortes Gonzalez pled guilty to conspiracy to manufacture, to distribute, and to possess with intent to distribute cocaine HCL, cocaine base, and methamphetamine (Count 1), in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 (2006), and using and carrying a firearm during or in relation to a drug trafficking crime (Count 69), in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 924(c) (2006). Gonzalez was sentenced to consecutive mandatory minimum terms of imprisonment of 120 months on Count 1 and 60 months on Count 69, for a total sentence of 180 months.

On appeal, Gonzalez argues that he was improperly convicted on Count 69 and that if that conviction is vacated, his sentence on Count 1 is flawed because without the conviction on Count 69, he would have met the qualifications for the “safety valve” provisions of 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) (2006) and U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 5C1.2 (2007), and thus may have received a sentence below the otherwise applicable statutory minimum term of 120 months.

The United States has filed a motion to vacate Gonzalez’s conviction and sentence on Count 69 and to remand to the district court for further proceedings. Gonzalez concurs in this disposition of Count 69.

*265 Upon consideration, the court grants the Government’s motion to vacate Gonzalez’s conviction and sentence on Count 69, and to remand to the district court for further proceedings as may be appropriate. In addition, we affirm Gonzalez’s conviction on Count 1. To preserve the rights of both Gonzalez and the Government as to Gonzalez’s sentence on Count 1, however, we further vacate Gonzalez’s sentence on Count 1, and remand with instructions that Gonzalez is to be resentenced as to Count 1 after the Government has had a reasonable opportunity to determine whether to pursue further charges against him.

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED IN PART, VACATED IN PART, AND REMANDED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzalez, 416 F. App'x 264 (4th Cir. 2011).

416 F. App'x 264 (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Imposition of a sentence
18 U.S.C. § 3553(e)
Penalties
18 U.S.C. § 924(c)
Attempt and conspiracy
21 U.S.C. § 846