United States v. Gonzalez

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Gonzalez

427 F. App'x 765

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided May 24, 2011·No. No. 10-15263·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Allen P. Pegg, appointed counsel for Gumercindo Gonzalez, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Allen P. Pegg, appointed counsel for Gumercindo Gonzalez, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gonzalez, 427 F. App'x 765 (11th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

427 F. App'x 765 (United States v. Gonzalez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related