United States v. Gonzalez

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Gonzalez

322 F. App'x 899

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedApril 10, 2009

DocketNo. 08-14802

StatusPublished

This text of 322 F. App'x 899 (United States v. Gonzalez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Gonzalez, 322 F. App'x 899 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Neal Gary Rosensweig, appointed counsel for Alberto Gonzalez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Neal Gary Rosensweig, appointed counsel for Alberto Gonzalez in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzalez’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

322 F. App'x 899, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gonzalez-ca11-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack