United States v. Gonzales-Robles

285 F. App'x 168
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJuly 23, 2008
Docket07-51437
StatusUnpublished

This text of 285 F. App'x 168 (United States v. Gonzales-Robles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gonzales-Robles, 285 F. App'x 168 (5th Cir. 2008).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Victor Alberto Gonzales-Robles (Gonzales) pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to import 50 kilograms or more of marijuana; he was sentenced to 97 months of imprisonment. The district court’s judgment was entered on November 19, 2007, and the ten-day period for filing notice of appeal in a criminal proceeding expired on December 4, 2007. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(1)(A). Gonzales’s notice of appeal was filed on December 5, 2007.

Gonzales’s failure to comply with the time limitations imposed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(b) does not deprive this court of jurisdiction over his appeal. See United States v. Martinez, 496 F.3d 387, 388-89 (5th Cir.2007). However, compliance with Rule 4(b)(1)(A) is required so long as the government has not waived its application. Id.

A district court may grant a defendant an additional 30 days in which to file a notice of appeal upon a showing of excusable neglect or good cause. Fed. R.App. P. 4(b)(4). Gonzales’s notice of appeal, which was filed within this additional 30-day period, suffices as a motion for a finding on excusable neglect or good cause. See United States v. Golding, 739 F.2d 183, 184 (5th Cir.1984). This case is remanded to the district court for the limited purpose of determining whether excusable neglect or good cause entitles Gonzales to an extension of time to file a notice of appeal.

REMANDED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert Henry Golding
739 F.2d 183 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)
United States v. Martinez
496 F.3d 387 (Fifth Circuit, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
285 F. App'x 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gonzales-robles-ca5-2008.