United States v. Gonzales

80 F. App'x 362
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzales. Read the opinion of the Court — 327 F.3d 416
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 12, 2003·No. 03-50579·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM. *

Karl Anthony Gonzales, federal prisoner # 57726-080, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for a nunc pro tunc judgment to amend his 1992 judgment of conviction with an order that his federal sentence run concurrently with his state sentence. He sought credit toward his federal sentence for time served on his subsequently imposed state sentence.

Gonzales’s motion was an unauthorized one over which the district court did not have jurisdiction. See United States v. Early, 27 F.3d 140, 141-42 (5th Cir.1994). The denial of the motion was correct. Id. Gonzales’s request for the appointment of counsel is DENIED.

AFFIRMED; MOTION DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzales, 80 F. App'x 362 (5th Cir. 2003).

80 F. App'x 362 (United States v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Darrell Early
27 F.3d 140 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)