United States v. Gonzales

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gonzales. Read the opinion of the Court — 121 F.3d 928
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 16, 1996·No. 96-40209·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 96-40209 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

JOSÉ ARMANDO GONZALES,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. B-95-CR-262-01 - - - - - - - - - - December 10, 1996 Before WIENER, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

José Armando Gonzales appeals his sentence in a guilty-plea

conviction for possession with intent to distribute approximately

297.7 kilos of marijuana. He argues that the district court

erred in increasing his offense level by two levels pursuant to

U.S.S.G. § 3B1.1(c). Gonzales further contends that, because of

the allegedly erroneous finding that he was an organizer, leader,

manager, or supervisor in a criminal activity, he did not qualify

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-40209 - 2 -

for the “safety value” provision of § 5C1.2, and he received the

mandatory minimum sentence of five years. We have reviewed the

record and the briefs and hold that the findings of the district

court are not clearly erroneous. See United States v. Alvarado,

898 F.2d 987, 993 (5th Cir. 1990).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gonzales, (5th Cir. 1996).

United States v. Gonzales (United States v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related