United States v. Gonzales

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Gonzales

322 F. App'x 948

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided April 14, 2009·No. No. 08-10331·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Valentin Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Cristobal Gonzales in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief [949] pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzales’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Valentin Rodriguez, appointed counsel for Cristobal Gonzales in this direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation and filed a brief [949] pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record confirms that there are no issues of arguable merit on appeal. Therefore, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Gonzales’s convictions and sentences are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gonzales, 322 F. App'x 948 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

322 F. App'x 948 (United States v. Gonzales) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related