United States v. Gonsales-Perez

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 23, 2003
Docket02-41310
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Gonsales-Perez (United States v. Gonsales-Perez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gonsales-Perez, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 24, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 02-41310 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

BERNARDO GONSALES-PEREZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. L-02-CR-380-3 --------------------

Before DeMOSS, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Bernardo Gonsales-Perez pleaded guilty to transporting

aliens within the United States and was sentenced to 30 months

of imprisonment and three years of supervised release. On

appeal, he argues that the district court erred by increasing

his offense level by six pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(2)(B)

because his offense involved transporting 31 aliens and by two

pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 2L1.1(b)(5) because the offense involved

the intentional or reckless creation of substantial risk of death

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 02-41310 -2-

or serious bodily injury because of the conditions in which the

aliens were transported in the trucks. The district court’s

application of the sentencing guidelines is reviewed de novo,

while its findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. United

States v. Harrington, 82 F.3d 83, 86 (5th Cir. 1996). Gonsales-

Perez has not shown that information that the district court

relied on in sentencing him was materially untrue. United States

v. Puig-Infante, 19 F.3d 929, 943 (5th Cir. 1994). Accordingly,

he has not shown that the district court erred in sentencing him

under the guidelines. See U.S.S.G. § 1B1.3(a)(1)(B) (relevant

conduct); United States v. Cuyler, 298 F.3d 387, 389 (5th Cir.

2002) (reckless endangerment).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Puig-Infante
19 F.3d 929 (Fifth Circuit, 1994)
United States v. Patrick Hough Harrington
82 F.3d 83 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Kimber Lee Cuyler, Jr.
298 F.3d 387 (Fifth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Gonsales-Perez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gonsales-perez-ca5-2003.