United States v. Gomez-Vallejo

446 F. App'x 705
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 21, 2011·No. No. 10-50773·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Jose Maria Gomez-Vallejo has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed briefs in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir.2011). Gomez-Vallejo has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s briefs and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motions for leave to withdraw are GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gomez-Vallejo, 446 F. App'x 705 (5th Cir. 2011).

446 F. App'x 705 (United States v. Gomez-Vallejo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Christopher Hornyak
588 F. App'x 384 (Fifth Circuit, 2014)