United States v. Gomez

133 F.4th 1083
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gomez. Read the opinion of the Court — 115 F.4th 987
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided April 14, 2025·No. 23-435·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 14 2025 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 23-435 D.C. No. Plaintiff - Appellee, 8:20-cr-00171-JVS-FWS-5 Central District of California, v. Santa Ana JESUS RAMIRO GOMEZ, AKA Hunter, ORDER

Defendant - Appellant.

MURGUIA, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that

this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 40(c)

and Circuit Rule 40-3. The three-judge panel opinion is vacated.

Judge Lee did not participate in the deliberations or vote in this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gomez, 133 F.4th 1083 (9th Cir. 2025).

133 F.4th 1083 (United States v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lopez Herrera v. Blanche
Ninth Circuit, 2026
United States v. Gomez
Ninth Circuit, 2026