United States v. Gomez
This text of United States v. Gomez (United States v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 19-41043 Document: 00515739654 Page: 1 Date Filed: 02/10/2021
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED No. 19-41043 February 10, 2021 Conference Calendar Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Antonio Javier Gomez,
Defendant—Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 7:17-CR-588-4
Before Smith, Stewart, and Higginson, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam:* The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Javier Gomez has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gomez has filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s
* Pursuant to 5th Circuit Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opin- ion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Circuit Rule 47.5.4. Case: 19-41043 Document: 00515739654 Page: 2 Date Filed: 02/10/2021
No. 19-41043
brief, relevant portions of the record, and Gomez’s response. We concur with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for review. Accordingly, the motion to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Gomez, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gomez-ca5-2021.