United States v. Gomez

119 F. App'x 679
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2005
Docket04-10054
StatusUnpublished

This text of 119 F. App'x 679 (United States v. Gomez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gomez, 119 F. App'x 679 (5th Cir. 2005).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Jorge Gomez, federal inmate #32875-077, appeals the district court’s denial of his motion under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32 to correct the Presentence Report (PSR). The Government’s motion to dismiss Gomez’s appeal as frivolous is DENIED. Further briefing, however, is unnecessary.

Complaints regarding the contents of a PSR must be raised prior to the imposition of sentence; therefore, the district court did not have jurisdiction to consider Gomez’s postsentence motion to correct the PSR. See United States v. Engs, 884 F.2d 894, 895-97 (5th Cir.1989). This court is, therefore, without jurisdiction over Gomez’s appeal. See United States v. Key, 205 F.3d 773, 774 (5th Cir.2000). The judgment of the district court is VACATED, and the appeal is DISMISSED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Key
205 F.3d 773 (Fifth Circuit, 2000)
United States v. Stephen Larned Engs
884 F.2d 894 (Fifth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
119 F. App'x 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gomez-ca5-2005.