United States v. Gomez

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gomez. Read the opinion of the Court — 276 F.3d 694
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided October 20, 1999·No. 98-51025·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-51025 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ROGERIO GOMEZ,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. DR-98-CR-63-1 - - - - - - - - - -

October 19, 1999

Before JONES, SMITH, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Rogerio Gomez appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

possession of a firearm by a convicted felon in violation of 18

U.S.C. § 922(g)(1). Gomez contends that § 922(g)(1) is

unconstitutional in view of the Supreme Court’s decision in

United States v. Lopez, 514 U.S. 549 (1995). Gomez acknowledges

that this court rejected this argument in United States v. Rawls,

85 F.3d 240, 242 (5th Cir. 1996), but states that he is raising

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-51025 -2-

this argument to preserve it for further review. In Rawls, this

court held that the reasons the Supreme Court gave in Lopez for

holding 18 U.S.C. § 922(q) unconstitutional do not apply to

§ 922(g). Rawls, 85 F.3d at 242. Because the sole argument

raised on appeal is foreclosed by this court’s precedent, the

district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gomez, (5th Cir. 1999).

United States v. Gomez (United States v. Gomez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Rawls
85 F.3d 240 (Fifth Circuit, 1996)
United States v. Lopez
514 U.S. 549 (Supreme Court, 1995)