United States v. Goldman
This text of 14 C.M.A. 598 (United States v. Goldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion of the Court
Among other offenses, the accused was found guilty of false swearing, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 134, 10 USC § 934. Our examination of the specification, however, discloses that its averments fail to allege, either expressly or by fair implication, that the statement was in fact false. Indeed, the count is, except for the factual material set forth therein, precisely the same as that which we found insufficient in United States v McCarthy, 11 USCMA 758, 29 CMR 574. Compare United States v Chaney, 12 USCMA 378, 30 CMR 378. The findings of guilty of Charge II are, accordingly, set aside.
The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of .the Army. The board may re[599]*599assess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty or order a rehearing on a proper specification and the penalty.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
14 C.M.A. 598, 14 USCMA 598, 34 C.M.R. 378, 1964 CMA LEXIS 231, 1964 WL 5030, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-goldman-cma-1964.