United States v. Goldman

14 C.M.A. 598, 14 USCMA 598, 34 C.M.R. 378, 1964 CMA LEXIS 231, 1964 WL 5030
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided June 12, 1964·No. No. 17,637·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM:

Among other offenses, the accused was found guilty of false swearing, in violation of Uniform Code of Military Justice, Article 134, 10 USC § 934. Our examination of the specification, however, discloses that its averments fail to allege, either expressly or by fair implication, that the statement was in fact false. Indeed, the count is, except for the factual material set forth therein, precisely the same as that which we found insufficient in United States v McCarthy, 11 USCMA 758, 29 CMR 574. Compare United States v Chaney, 12 USCMA 378, 30 CMR 378. The findings of guilty of Charge II are, accordingly, set aside.

The decision of the board of review is reversed, and the record of trial is returned to The Judge Advocate General of .the Army. The board may re[599] assess the sentence on the basis of the remaining findings of guilty or order a rehearing on a proper specification and the penalty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Goldman, 14 C.M.A. 598, 14 USCMA 598, 34 C.M.R. 378, 1964 CMA LEXIS 231, 1964 WL 5030 (cma 1964).

14 C.M.A. 598 (United States v. Goldman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Jones
20 M.J. 919 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1985)