United States v. Goad
This text of 18 C.M.A. 371 (United States v. Goad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
Following a guilty plea, the accused was convicted by a special court-martial at the U. S. Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, Florida, of absence without leave, in violation of Article 86, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 USC § 886. He was sentenced to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor for three months, and forfeiture of $106.00 per month for three months. Both the finding and sentence have been approved at each intermediate level of appellate review.
We initially granted review of this case to consider:
Whether the president’s instruction that the previous convictions “logically indicate that a more severe sentence should be adjudged,” prejudiced the accused.
This same instruction — also containing advice on the matter that “logically indicate that a more lenient sentence should be adjudged” — was the subject of our deliberations in United States v Wright, 18 USCMA 348, 350, 40 CMR 60. In that case, a majority of the Court deemed the instruction correct and proper. Cf. United States v Wheeler, 17 USCMA 274, 38 CMR 72. For the reasons there stated, the same result obtains here.
[372]*372The decision of the board of review is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
18 C.M.A. 371, 18 USCMA 371, 40 C.M.R. 83, 1969 CMA LEXIS 808, 1969 WL 6011, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-goad-cma-1969.