United States v. Glover

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Glover

393 F. App'x 616

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided August 18, 2010·No. No. 09-16432·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Stephen H. Harris, appointed counsel for Tyrone Vincent Glover, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to "withdraw is GRANTED, and Glover’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Stephen H. Harris, appointed counsel for Tyrone Vincent Glover, has filed a motion to withdraw from further representation, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to "withdraw is GRANTED, and Glover’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

United States v. Glover, 393 F. App'x 616 (11th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

393 F. App'x 616 (United States v. Glover) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related