United States v. Givens

W.D. New York

United States v. Givens

375 F. Supp. 2d 202, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14020, 2005 WL 1645689

CourtDistrict Court, W.D. New York

DecidedJuly 6, 2005

Docket6:04-cv-06057

StatusPublished

This text of 375 F. Supp. 2d 202 (United States v. Givens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Givens, 375 F. Supp. 2d 202, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14020, 2005 WL 1645689 (W.D.N.Y. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

On August 27, 2004, I sentenced the defendant, Erica L. Givens, principally to 18 months imprisonment. Judgement was *203 entered on August 31, 2004. Givens appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, but the case was remanded by the Court of Appeals on April 7, 2005 for this Court to consider whether to resentence Givens pursuant to principles enunciated in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103, 118-20 (2d Cir.2005).

I directed counsel to submit sentencing memoranda on the issue and both Givens and the Government have done so.

I am familiar with the Crosby decision. I have reviewed the sentencing memoran-da submitted by counsel, as well the pleadings submitted on the original sentencing, the transcript of the sentencing hearing on August 27, 2004, as well as my notes made at the time of sentencing.

I decline to resentence Givens. I imposed sentence at the lowest end of the Guideline range, 18 months. Were that sentence to be imposed today, subsequent to the decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), I would impose the same sentence.

Because the Government had filed a 5K.1 motion for downward departure based on the defendant’s cooperation, I had ample grounds to sentence below the applicable Guideline range of 18-24 months. I declined to do that when I originally imposed sentence, and I decline to do it now. As I indicated at sentencing, the defendant has the highest criminal history category and had approximately 15 prior convictions. Defendant has a very long record of drug use and crimes relating to drug addiction and use. In this case, Givens was rearrested shortly after this Court released her. As I indicated at sentencing, were it not for the Government’s 5K motion, I would have imposed an even greater sentence.

CONCLUSION

I decline to resentence the defendant Erica Givens, and defendant’s application for a resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005) is in all respects denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DECISION AND ORDER

LARIMER, District Judge.

On August 27, 2004, I sentenced the defendant, Erica L. Givens, principally to 18 months imprisonment. Judgement was *203 entered on August 31, 2004. Givens appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, but the case was remanded by the Court of Appeals on April 7, 2005 for this Court to consider whether to resentence Givens pursuant to principles enunciated in United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103, 118-20 (2d Cir.2005).

I directed counsel to submit sentencing memoranda on the issue and both Givens and the Government have done so.

I am familiar with the Crosby decision. I have reviewed the sentencing memoran-da submitted by counsel, as well the pleadings submitted on the original sentencing, the transcript of the sentencing hearing on August 27, 2004, as well as my notes made at the time of sentencing.

I decline to resentence Givens. I imposed sentence at the lowest end of the Guideline range, 18 months. Were that sentence to be imposed today, subsequent to the decision in United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005), I would impose the same sentence.

Because the Government had filed a 5K.1 motion for downward departure based on the defendant’s cooperation, I had ample grounds to sentence below the applicable Guideline range of 18-24 months. I declined to do that when I originally imposed sentence, and I decline to do it now. As I indicated at sentencing, the defendant has the highest criminal history category and had approximately 15 prior convictions. Defendant has a very long record of drug use and crimes relating to drug addiction and use. In this case, Givens was rearrested shortly after this Court released her. As I indicated at sentencing, were it not for the Government’s 5K motion, I would have imposed an even greater sentence.

CONCLUSION

I decline to resentence the defendant Erica Givens, and defendant’s application for a resentencing in light of United States v. Booker, — U.S.-, 125 S.Ct. 738, 160 L.Ed.2d 621 (2005) and United States v. Crosby, 397 F.3d 103 (2d Cir.2005) is in all respects denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

375 F. Supp. 2d 202, 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14020, 2005 WL 1645689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-givens-nywd-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack