United States v. Giron

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Giron

32 F. App'x 99

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 12, 2002·No. Nos. 01-7014, 01-7088·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Dimas Atilio Giron appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and his request for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a [100] certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Giron, No. CR-99-32-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 23 & June 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Dimas Atilio Giron appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2001) and his request for a certificate of appealability. We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinions and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a [100] certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeals substantially on the reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Giron, No. CR-99-32-A (E.D. Va. Mar. 23 & June 14, 2001). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

United States v. Giron, 32 F. App'x 99 (4th Cir. 2002).

Pincite

32 F. App'x 99 (United States v. Giron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related