United States v. Ginsberg

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Ginsberg

247 F. 1006, 159 C.C.A. 665, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1728

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedDecember 29, 1917

DocketNo. 4363

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 247 F. 1006 (United States v. Ginsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Ginsberg, 247 F. 1006, 159 C.C.A. 665, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1728 (8th Cir. 1917).

Pincite

Opinion

HOOK, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit by the United States to cancel 'a certificate of citizenship issued to Solomon Louis Ginsberg, a native of Russia, on the ground that it was illegally procured. It was brought under the provisions of section 15 of the Act of June 29, 1906, c. 3592, 34 Stat. 601 (Comp. St. 1916, § 4374). It was charged that the hearing of the petition for naturalization. was not in open court as required by the act of Congress but was in the chambers of the judge; also that the undisputed facts disclosed at the hearing showed that Ginsberg was not entitled to citizenship. The court beLow held that the error in issuing the certificate, if any, was one of law which could not be reviewed by independent suit. It accordingly dismissed the petition of the government. Upon appeal here this court certified to the Supreme Court of the United States the substantial questions Involved, and sufficient of them were answered to determine conclusively, first, that the hearing of the petition for naturalization was not in open court; and, second, that i f, at such hearing, the judge misapplied the law to facts showing the petitioner was not entitled to citizenship, the certificate issued was illegally procured and could be canceled in an independent suit by the government. 243 U. S. 472, 37 Sup. Ct. 422, 61 L. Ed. 853. The decree of the court below is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the opinions of the Supreme Court and this court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HOOK, Circuit Judge.

This is a suit by the United States to cancel 'a certificate of citizenship issued to Solomon Louis Ginsberg, a native of Russia, on the ground that it was illegally procured. It was brought under the provisions of section 15 of the Act of June 29, 1906, c. 3592, 34 Stat. 601 (Comp. St. 1916, § 4374). It was charged that the hearing of the petition for naturalization. was not in open court as required by the act of Congress but was in the chambers of the judge; also that the undisputed facts disclosed at the hearing showed that Ginsberg was not entitled to citizenship. The court beLow held that the error in issuing the certificate, if any, was one of law which could not be reviewed by independent suit. It accordingly dismissed the petition of the government. Upon appeal here this court certified to the Supreme Court of the United States the substantial questions Involved, and sufficient of them were answered to determine conclusively, first, that the hearing of the petition for naturalization was not in open court; and, second, that i f, at such hearing, the judge misapplied the law to facts showing the petitioner was not entitled to citizenship, the certificate issued was illegally procured and could be canceled in an independent suit by the government. 243 U. S. 472, 37 Sup. Ct. 422, 61 L. Ed. 853. The decree of the court below is reversed, and the cause is remanded for further proceedings in accordance with the opinions of the Supreme Court and this court.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

247 F. 1006, 159 C.C.A. 665, 1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ginsberg-ca8-1917.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack