United States v. Ginaitt

20 C.M.A. 216, 20 USCMA 216, 43 C.M.R. 56, 1970 CMA LEXIS 663, 1970 WL 7428
United States Court of Military Appeals·Decided December 18, 1970·No. No. 23,220·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Of the two issues granted in this case, only one requires attention. Failure of the appellant to request trial by military judge alone, in writing, before or at the inception of trial constitutes a jurisdictional defect rendering the findings and sentence invalid. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

Accordingly, the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ginaitt, 20 C.M.A. 216, 20 USCMA 216, 43 C.M.R. 56, 1970 CMA LEXIS 663, 1970 WL 7428 (cma 1970).

20 C.M.A. 216 (United States v. Ginaitt) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Smith
41 M.J. 817 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1995)
Allen v. United States
21 C.M.A. 288 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)