United States v. Ginaitt
This text of 20 C.M.A. 216 (United States v. Ginaitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Opinion of the Court
Of the two issues granted in this case, only one requires attention. Failure of the appellant to request trial by military judge alone, in writing, before or at the inception of trial constitutes a jurisdictional defect rendering the findings and sentence invalid. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).
Accordingly, the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
20 C.M.A. 216, 20 USCMA 216, 43 C.M.R. 56, 1970 CMA LEXIS 663, 1970 WL 7428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ginaitt-cma-1970.