United States v. Ginaitt

20 C.M.A. 216, 20 USCMA 216, 43 C.M.R. 56, 1970 CMA LEXIS 663, 1970 WL 7428
CourtUnited States Court of Military Appeals
DecidedDecember 18, 1970
DocketNo. 23,220
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 20 C.M.A. 216 (United States v. Ginaitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Court of Military Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Ginaitt, 20 C.M.A. 216, 20 USCMA 216, 43 C.M.R. 56, 1970 CMA LEXIS 663, 1970 WL 7428 (cma 1970).

Opinions

Opinion of the Court

Darden, Judge:

Of the two issues granted in this case, only one requires attention. Failure of the appellant to request trial by military judge alone, in writing, before or at the inception of trial constitutes a jurisdictional defect rendering the findings and sentence invalid. United States v Dean, 20 USCMA 212, 43 CMR 52 (1970).

Accordingly, the decision of the United States Navy Court of Military Review is reversed. The findings of guilty and sentence are set aside. The record of trial is returned to the Judge Advocate General of the Navy. Another trial may be ordered.

Judge Ferguson concurs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Smith
41 M.J. 817 (Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals, 1995)
Allen v. United States
21 C.M.A. 288 (United States Court of Military Appeals, 1972)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
20 C.M.A. 216, 20 USCMA 216, 43 C.M.R. 56, 1970 CMA LEXIS 663, 1970 WL 7428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-ginaitt-cma-1970.