United States v. Gillespie

6 F. 803, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2175
CourtUnited States Circuit Court
DecidedApril 22, 1881
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 6 F. 803 (United States v. Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Circuit Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gillespie, 6 F. 803, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2175 (uscirct 1881).

Opinion

By the Coubt.

This is an application to the court by the defendants, executors of Joseph L. Lewis, deceased, for leave to plead various pleas. The matters specified in the notice, and sought to be set up by pleas, merely suspend the right to sue, and are offered to defeat the particular proceeding instituted, rather than to relieve the defendants wholly from the demand, and hence are defences in abatement and not in bar. Such matters are expressly excluded from the provisions of the thirty-ninth equity rule, and we perceive no valid reason why the defendants should not be allowed to plead them, if they prefer so to do, rather than set them up in their answer. The leave, however, does not apply to the alleged want of proper parties to the suit. The fifty-second equity rule makes provision for such a speedy disposition of all suggestions in the answer in regard to dfefective parties that nothing is gained and no necessity exists for a plea.

The defendants are allowed to plead all matters in abatement, which, in the judgment of counsel, render the action premature under the provisions of the statutes of the state of New Jersey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 F. 803, 1881 U.S. App. LEXIS 2175, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gillespie-uscirct-1881.