United States v. Gill

District Court, District of Columbia·Decided July 28, 2009·No. Criminal No. 2002-0096·Published

Opinion

UNITED STATEs DISTRICT CoURT for the District of Columbia

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

criminal Aeri@n N@. 02-096 F l I_ E D

)

vs. ) ) JMF/JBD l ) )

MICHAEL GILL, jUL 2 8 2009 Defendant NANCY MA¥ER WH|IT!NGTGN. CLERK U.S. DlSTRlCT COURT

Report and Recommendation Pertaining to CONSENT TO MODIFY PROBATION/SUPERVISED RELEASE

lt appearing that the parties are agreed that the def`endant's conditions of supervised release/ probation should be modified and there accordingly, being no objection thereto, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT the defendant's conditions of supervised release/ probation are modified so that as modified THE DEFENDANT WILL SERVE THE NEXT 90 DAYS OF HIS TERM OF SUPERVISED RELEASE SUBJECT TO ELECTRONIC MONITORING UNDER THE SUPERVISION OF THE PROBATION OFFICE.

S/ John M. Facciola U.S. Magistrate Judge Dated: July 23, 2009.

Failure to file timely objections to the findings and recommendations set forth in this report may waive

your right of appeal from an order of the District Court adopting such findings and recommendations See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985).

The magistrate judge having recommended that the conditions of the defendant's supervised release/probation be modified and there being no objection thereto, IT IS ORDERED that the recommendation

of the magistrate judge is accepted. @/»$-

U.’S. Distn`ct Court Judge Dated: f/'l:£\\j >»?_, z-m)~'~;

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gill, (D.D.C. 2009).

United States v. Gill (United States v. Gill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Thomas v. Arn
474 U.S. 140 (Supreme Court, 1986)