United States v. Giles
This text of United States v. Giles (United States v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-6784
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
DINO MARCELLUS GILES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, Chief District Judge. (CA-04-65-1-IMK)
Submitted: July 27, 2005 Decided: August 5, 2005
Before KING, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Dino Marcellus Giles, Appellant Pro Se. Bonnie S. Greenberg, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Dino Marcellus Giles, a federal prisoner, appeals the
district court’s order accepting the magistrate judge’s
recommendation and dismissing Giles’ petition filed under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (2000), and the court’s order denying his motion for
reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by
the district court. See United States v. Giles, No. CA-04-65-1-IMK
(N.D.W. Va. Apr. 28, 2005; May 12, 2005). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Giles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-giles-ca4-2005.