United States v. GILEAD SCIENCES, INC.

• Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
• Decided: September 11, 2025
• Docket: 2:17-cv-01183
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al.

Plaintiffs,

v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 17-1183 GILEAD SCIENCES, INC et al., Defendants.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 11th day of September 2025, upon consideration of Defendant Gilead Sciences, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment and Motion for Sanctions, and Plaintiff-Relator Toby Travis’s Request for Judicial Notice, and the responses thereto, and for the reasons set forth in the accompanying opinion, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Plaintiff-Relator’s Request for Judicial Notice [Doc. No. 307] is GRANTED. 2. Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. No. 240] is GRANTED. 3. Plaintiff-Relator’s Motion to Seal [Doc. No. 210] is GRANTED as good cause has been shown.1 4. The following motions are DISMISSED as moot: a. Defendant’s Motion for Sanctions [Doc. No. 203].

1 Plaintiff-Relator moves to seal and/or redact certain declarations and exhibits in connection with briefing on Defendant’s Motion for Terminating Sanctions. The information requested to be sealed in the Motion to Seal [Doc. No. 210] contains confidential and commercially sensitive information which is highly sensitive business information that may be sealed when public disclosure may put a party as a competitive disadvantage. In re Avandia Mktg., Sales Pracs. & Prods. Liab. Litig., 924 F.3d 662, 679 (3d Cir. 2019). In addition, Plaintiff-Relator has already filed narrowly redacted public versions of the documents on the docket. Plaintiff-Relator has shown good cause for sealing the requested information and the Motion to Seal [Doc. No. 210] will be granted. b. Plaintiff-Relator’s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Amy Ravi [Doc. No. 232]. c. Plaintiff-Relator’s Motion to Exclude Opinions and Testimony of Anupam B. Jena [Doc. No. 233]. d. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Virginia Evans [Doc. No. 235].

e. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Laura Denton [Doc. No. 236]. f. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of Genevieve Kanter [Doc. No. 237]. g. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of David Healy [Doc. No. 238]. h. Defendant’s Motion to Exclude Testimony of George Triadafilopoulos [Doc. No. 239]. i. Defendant’s Motion to Strike Dr. Kanter’s Corrected Expert Report [Doc. No. 250]. j. Defendant’s Unredacted Motion to Strike Dr. Kanter’s Corrected Expert

Report [Doc. No. 252]. k. Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Setting Briefing Deadlines [Doc. No. 273]. 5. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE this case.

It is so ORDERED. BY THE COURT:

/s/ Cynthia M. Rufe _____________________ CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J.