United States v. Gilbreath

73 M.J. 423, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 635

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gilbreath. Read the opinion of the Court — 74 M.J. 11 →

Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces·Decided June 27, 2014·No. No. 14-0322/MC·Published

Opinion

CCA 201200427. Review granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER INDIVIDUAL READY RESERVISTS, SUBJECT TO PUNISHMENT UNDER THE UCMJ, ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROTECTIONS OF ARTICLE 31(b) WHEN QUESTIONED BY SENIOR SERVICE MEMBERS ABOUT SUSPECTED MISCONDUCT COMMITTED ON ACTIVE DUTY.

II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT APPELLANT’S STATEMENTS WERE ADMISSIBLE UNDER ARTICLE 31(b), UCMJ, AND MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 305.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CCA 201200427. Review granted on the following issues:

I. WHETHER INDIVIDUAL READY RESERVISTS, SUBJECT TO PUNISHMENT UNDER THE UCMJ, ARE ENTITLED TO THE PROTECTIONS OF ARTICLE 31(b) WHEN QUESTIONED BY SENIOR SERVICE MEMBERS ABOUT SUSPECTED MISCONDUCT COMMITTED ON ACTIVE DUTY.

II. WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ERRED IN CONCLUDING THAT APPELLANT’S STATEMENTS WERE ADMISSIBLE UNDER ARTICLE 31(b), UCMJ, AND MILITARY RULE OF EVIDENCE 305.

Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.

United States v. Gilbreath, 73 M.J. 423, 2014 CAAF LEXIS 635 (Ark. 2014).

Pincite

73 M.J. 423 (United States v. Gilbreath) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.