United States v. Gilberto Santana
This text of 306 F.2d 880 (United States v. Gilberto Santana) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
306 F.2d 880
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee,
v.
Gilberto SANTANA, Appellant.
No. 403.
Docket 27736.
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit.
Argued August 21, 1962.
Decided August 21, 1962.
Arnold Wallach, New York City (Harold O. N. Frankel, New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Arthur I. Rosett, Asst. U. S. Atty. (Robert M. Morgenthau, U. S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, New York City, Robert J. Geniesse, Asst. U. S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and MOORE and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We affirm the judgment of conviction. There was abundant evidence to support Judge Murphy's conclusion, sitting without a jury, that the appellant had control of the narcotics and his finding that the appellant was guilty as charged of violations of 21 U.S.C. §§ 173, 174.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
306 F.2d 880, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gilberto-santana-ca2-1962.