United States v. Gibson
Opinion
Case: 24-40094 Document: 52-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 11/27/2024
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
____________ FILED November 27, 2024 No. 24-40094 Lyle W. Cayce Summary Calendar Clerk ____________
United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Michael Ian Gibson,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-173-1 ______________________________
Before Haynes, Higginson, and Douglas, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * The attorney appointed to represent Michael Ian Gibson has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967), and United States v. Flores, 632 F.3d 229 (5th Cir. 2011). Gibson has not filed a response. We have reviewed counsel’s brief and the relevant portions of the record reflected therein. We concur
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-40094 Document: 52-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 11/27/2024
No. 24-40094
with counsel’s assessment that the appeal presents no nonfrivolous issue for appellate review. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2. 1
_____________________ 1 This, of course, does not affect the ability of the defendant to seek correction of any clerical error under Rule 36.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Gibson (United States v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.