United States v. Gibson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gibson. Read the opinion of the Court — 108 F. App'x 975
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided December 13, 2001·No. 01-30191·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-30191 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

TRENT GIBSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana USDC No. 00-CR-196-1-F -------------------- December 12, 2001 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and STEWART, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Counsel appointed to represent Trent Gibson has requested

leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v.

California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Gibson has not responded to the

motion. Our independent review of the brief and the record

discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for

leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further

responsibilities, and the appeal is DISMISSED. See 5TH CIR. R.

42.2.

MOTION GRANTED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gibson, (5th Cir. 2001).

United States v. Gibson (United States v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)