United States v. Gibson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gibson. Read the opinion of the Court — 55 F.3d 173
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 11, 1995·No. 94-11114·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 94-11114 Conference Calendar __________________

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DONNELL GIBSON,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 5:94-CR-32-08 - - - - - - - - - - June 30, 1995 Before JONES, WIENER, and EMILIO M. GARZA, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Court-appointed counsel for Donnell Gibson has filed a brief

as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct.

1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 993 (1967), and we have independently reviewed

counsel's brief and the record. We find no nonfrivolous issue.

Accordingly, counsel is excused from further responsibilities

herein and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

* Local Rule 47.5 provides: "The publication of opinions that have no precedential value and merely decide particular cases on the basis of well-settled principles of law imposes needless expense on the public and burdens on the legal profession." Pursuant to that Rule, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gibson, (5th Cir. 1995).

United States v. Gibson (United States v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Anders v. California
386 U.S. 738 (Supreme Court, 1967)