United States v. Gibson

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Gibson

419 F. App'x 306

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 18, 2011·No. No. 10-7453·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Gibson, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Gibson, No. 8:94-cr-00454-P JM-2 (D.Md. Oct. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Bernard Gibson, Sr., appeals the district court’s order denying his self-styled Fed. R.Crim.P. 36 motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See United States v. Gibson, No. 8:94-cr-00454-P JM-2 (D.Md. Oct. 8, 2010). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Gibson, 419 F. App'x 306 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

419 F. App'x 306 (United States v. Gibson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related