United States v. Gibbs

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Gibbs. Read the opinion of the Court — 185 F. App'x 258
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 22, 2003·No. 03-6920·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 03-6920

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DERRICK RONARD GIBBS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (CR-98-192)

Submitted: August 14, 2003 Decided: August 22, 2003

Before WILLIAMS, KING, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Derrick Ronard Gibbs, Appellant Pro Se. Gretchen C.F. Shappert, Assistant United States Attorney, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Derrick Ronard Gibbs appeals the district court’s order

denying his “Motion to Compel Government for Motion for Reduction

of Sentence Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) and Rule 35(b) Federal

Rules of Criminal Procedure.” We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated

by the district court. See United States v. Gibbs, No. CR-98-192

(W.D.N.C. June 3, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gibbs, (4th Cir. 2003).

United States v. Gibbs (United States v. Gibbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Imposition of a sentence
18 U.S.C. § 3553(e)