United States v. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim

19 F.3d 13, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11511, 1994 WL 65250
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 24, 1994·No. 93-7090·Unpublished

Opinion

19 F.3d 13

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff Appellee,
v.
Ghulam Mohammed NASIM, Defendant Appellant.

No. 93-7090.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: Jan. 20, 1994.
Decided: Feb. 24, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge.

Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, appellant Pro Se.

Stephen L. Purcell, Asst. U.S. Atty., Baltimore, MD, for appellee.

D.Md.

AFFIRMED.

Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying Nasim's motions for a reduction of sentence and for recusal of the district court judge. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Nasim, No. CR-88-378-HM (D. Md. Sept. 24, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim, 19 F.3d 13, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 11511, 1994 WL 65250 (4th Cir. 1994).

19 F.3d 13 (United States v. Ghulam Mohammed Nasim) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.