United States v. German-Sanchez
This text of 648 F. App'x 679 (United States v. German-Sanchez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
In these consolidated appeals, Lauterio Domingo German-Sanchez appeals the aggregate 36-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326, and revocation of supervised release. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.
German-Sanchez contends that the district court procedurally erred by failing to explain the sentence adequately and respond to his mitigating arguments. We review for plain error, see United States v. Valencia-Barragan, 608 F.3d 1103, 1108 (9th Cir.2010), and find none. The record reflects that the district court considered German-Sanchez’s mitigating arguments and adequately explained the sentence. See Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338, 358-59, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007).
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
648 F. App'x 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-german-sanchez-ca9-2016.