United States v. German

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. German. Read the opinion of the Court — 431 F. App'x 248
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2011·No. 11-6417·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 11-6417

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

TONY B. GERMAN, a/k/a Antonio,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Terry L. Wooten, District Judge. (4:02-cr-00802-TLW-1; 4:11-cv-70004-TLW)

Submitted: May 19, 2011 Decided: May 24, 2011

Before TRAXLER, Chief Judge, and AGEE and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Tony B. German, Appellant Pro Se. Alfred William Walker Bethea, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Tony B. German appeals the district court’s order

denying relief on his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp. 2010)

motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. See United States v. German, Nos. 4:02-cr-

00802-TLW-1; 4:11-cv-70004-TLW (D.S.C. Mar. 11, 2011). We

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. German, (4th Cir. 2011).

United States v. German (United States v. German) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related