United States v. Gerhard Willi August Lacher

299 F.2d 919
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 13, 1962
Docket17465_1
StatusPublished
Cited by9 cases

This text of 299 F.2d 919 (United States v. Gerhard Willi August Lacher) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gerhard Willi August Lacher, 299 F.2d 919 (9th Cir. 1962).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

One Lacher, a native and citizen of Germany, was admitted to the United States for permanent residence on February 6, 1953. He registered under the Selective Service Act and immediately thereafter executed a Form C-294 entitled, “Application by Alien for Exemption from Military Service.” On March 3, 1954, he was classified IV-C (Exempt Treaty Alien) pursuant to a treaty then in effect between his country and the United States. On October 5, 1954, following the abrogation of the said treaty, Lacher was reclassified I-A and was subsequently inducted into the United States Army on May 28, 1956.

On June 28, 1960, appellee filed a petition for naturalization under the general provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1427. The Immigration and Naturalization Examiner recommended denial of the said petition on the ground that appellee had been relieved from military service within the meaning of § 315 of the Immigration and Nationality Act, 8 U.S.C.A. § 1426. The district court overruled said recommendation and granted citizenship to Lacher, citing as authority for its decision the cases of In re Rego’s Petition, 289 F.2d 174 (CA3, 1961), Cannon v. United States, 288 F.2d 269 (CA2, 1961), and United States v. Hoellger, 273 F.2d 760 (CA2, 1960). Said cases are factually almost identical with the instant case.

The government takes the position that said cases were incorrectly decided and urges this court to disregard them, and reverse the judgment of the trial court.

We agree with the trial court that the petition of Lacher should be granted and rely, as did the trial court, on In re Rego’s Petition, 289 F.2d 174 (CA3, 1961), Cannon v. United States, 288 F. 2d 269 (CA2, 1961), and United States v. Hoellger, 273 F.2d 760 (CA2, 1960).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gallarde v. Ins
Ninth Circuit, 2007
MINCHEFF
13 I. & N. Dec. 715 (Board of Immigration Appeals, 1971)
In re Petition for Naturalization of Lapenieks
249 F. Supp. 398 (S.D. California, 1965)
In re Petition for Naturalization of Kadich
221 F. Supp. 353 (S.D. New York, 1963)
In re for Naturalization of Krummenacher
202 F. Supp. 781 (N.D. California, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
299 F.2d 919, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gerhard-willi-august-lacher-ca9-1962.