United States v. Gerberti

42 F.2d 570, 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1185
District Court, S.D. New York·Decided May 21, 1930·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

CAFFEY, District Judge.

Neither the petitioner nor the Prohibition Administrator is a party, nor has the latter been served. In these circumstances the court is without jurisdiction to grant the relief sought. See Lewis v. McCarthy (D. C.) 274 F. 496; In re Allen (D. C.) 1 F.(2d) 1020, 1021; Matter of Otto Behrens (2 C. C. A.) 39 F.(2d) 561.

Apparently, to date, the Prohibition Administrator has failed to take any steps with; respect to the seized property now in his possession. For that reason the court will afford the petitioner opportunity to litigate his claim of rights if and whenever an appropriate remedy is invoked.

Motion denied, without prejudice to any other form of proceeding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Gerberti, 42 F.2d 570, 1930 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1185 (S.D.N.Y. 1930).

42 F.2d 570 (United States v. Gerberti) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Mahon
42 F.2d 571 (S.D. New York, 1930)