United States v. Gerardo Restaino and Joseph Mustachio, Joseph Mustacchio

403 F.2d 218, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7757
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedMarch 11, 1968
Docket17079_1
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 403 F.2d 218 (United States v. Gerardo Restaino and Joseph Mustachio, Joseph Mustacchio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Gerardo Restaino and Joseph Mustachio, Joseph Mustacchio, 403 F.2d 218, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7757 (3d Cir. 1968).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

PER CURIAM.

We have before us a motion filed by the United States to cancel or revoke Mustaechio’s bail. The motion asserts that his bail should be cancelled because allegedly he is not and was not living at the address stated in the bail bond at the time bail was given. This presents an issue of fact which cannot be resolved without a hearing. One of the issues to be adjudicated is whether or not Mustacchio’s mistake, if it was such, was inadvertent or otherwise.

Accordingly, we will refer the motion to the court below to the end that it may determine whether or not Mustacchio’s bail should be revoked, cancelled or increased. Concerning these issues we express no opinion.

SEITZ, Circuit Judge, would refer the motion for appropriate disposition by the District Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
403 F.2d 218, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 7757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-gerardo-restaino-and-joseph-mustachio-joseph-mustacchio-ca3-1968.